Add a Comment
- The one good thing about faux newz censoring opposing viewpoints and truth on their website is, it makes all the ditto heads who can't think for themselves believe that everyone else agrees with their warped view of 'murka' (as in "we're here to take back our murka!"). They're in for a rude awakening the morning of 03 NOV.
- Reply to this comment
-
- Truth? How about Obama?s campaign? He said he would not use that money in a documented agreement with McCain, and then he DID! LIAR! There's some "truth". Where are Acorn, MoveOn, and all his union supporters getting donations from? For all we know, Alkita. Proof? Fair enough, but where is HIS proof that Republicans are using foreign funds? Happy to give if they do. If one has to come clean, ALL do. Unfortunately the Supreme Court says otherwise. Nov 2 we take out the trash (first wave). Keep up the "hope" it's really panning out for you.
- Barry Soetero and all DUMS! LIAR, LIAR, your pants are on fire!!!
- Reply to this comment
- To nprybes ... (1) Angry yup! Can't stand being mislead! (2) Well if you call voting fascism (which apparently you do) then, Yes!!!
- Reply to this comment
- "It's not Socialism I tell you! It's Hope and Change, Hope and Change!! You just don't get it!" No Mr. O. "We" get it. We just don't like it! www.byebyebarney.org
- Reply to this comment
- The democrats will say and do anything to make thenselves look honest or better than their opponents. Twist words, cut sound bites, lie about their past and their voting records, fail to pay taxes and to use taxpayer monies for personal use. All this and a whole lot more, and they still run on honesty and mon and apple pie, whin in fact they are some of the most corrupt people in the US. Money and votes, any way you can get them.
- Reply to this comment
- Just another attack on the private sector by the democrats. They dislike for people who work hard is clear. The party of food stamp will never change.
- Reply to this comment
- "Said Schieffer: "This part about foreign money, that appears to be peanuts. Mr. Axelrod, do you have any evidence that it's anything other than peanuts?" Replied Axelrod: "Well, do you have any evidence that it's not, Bob? The fact is that the Chamber has asserted that, but they won't release any information about where their campaign money is coming from." Typical politician spin. You can't prove a negative Mr. Axelrod. Besides, you're the one making the positive claim about how the CoC is accepting foreign donations. That places the burden of proof on you. Just like in a court of law. The CoC does not need to prove their innocence. That's how things work in this country sir. You would do well to learn that.
- Reply to this comment
- The Facts: There is a flood of secret money flowing into this election. No one knows where it is coming from. This is a bad thing for our democracy. The politics: Anything that puts the focus on the Republican alternative is a good thing for Democrats, as their flaws are plain to see once you examine them. Republicans would like to be just "Not Democrats" and win by default since people are unhappy. Democrats are smart to not let them get away with that.
- Reply to this comment
- No proof??? Oh, yeah - of the 'shadowy' part. The faux newz ditto heads think murderoch's a US citizen just because he's bought up so much US media. It's sickening the way their web site panders to them by censoring opposing views over there yet CNet/CBS allows them to spew their hate-filled bigoted rants over here.
- Reply to this comment
- Good for the Dems for finally waking up to 21st Century political strategy: IE, create sensationalized news stories that sound convincing but may or may not have any factual validity at all. This is no different -- but a lot less disguisting -- than demanding Obama show you his birth certificate, claiming there will be "death panels" that Obama's a Muslim, or whatever delusion of the day comes out of the tea party. Match fire with fire...solid strategy, dems, and about darn time.
- Reply to this comment
-
- A sitting president makes unsubstantiated charges against citizens that even the NY Times disputes, and that's a good thing?The accused must disprove the allegations, according to the WH? Is this really the way you think our democracy works? There is nothing more disgusting than a president publicly violating his oath of office in this way. It demeans both our country and the office that he holds.
